| You have to be suspicious of a compliment
immediately followed by a half-hidden
apology. You know the kind: "Oh my gosh! You
look so great! You must have lost weight! ;I
mean, you looked great before, too. You
always look great. You just look
extra-great now." Inside that slush of
praise is the real sentiment: I used to think
you were fat. Or, along the same lines: "Can I
just tell you how unbelievably insightful your
comment in class today was? I had no idea
you were so; I mean, I always thought you
were pretty smart, but today;"
Translated, Who would have thought a moron
like you could come up with something so
clever? It's a funny thing about our collective
American personality ; we feel guilty giving
compliments on progress because it implies
that the recipient wasn't at the apex of
perfection before. It's a silly thing to stress
over.
Be that as it may, I confess that it irritates me
when I get it. My ego does not take kindly to the
reminder that I am not already at the apex
even when the rest of me knows better. But
the example of this apologetic flattery to which
I was subjected recently is one heard by
many, and one, I think, which may represent a
more significant cultural quirk than mere
guilt-complimenting.
What happened is that I wore makeup. It was,
admittedly, a dramatic departure from the
usual for me. My poor mother has been
pleading with me for nearly a decade to look a
little more "professional": i.e., lose the
embroided Indian sundresses, pluck your
eyebrows (which, I insist, are already at the
apex of perfection without plucking), and start
wearing makeup. I have stubbornly refused, in
part due to sheer laziness. I have no desire to
become high maintenance. Luckily, my mom's
plea is based neither in vicarious vanity nor
social jockeying. She just thinks makeup
befits a young woman wishing to command
due respect and attention. She probably has a
point, but till now I never took the bait.
What pushed me over the edge was the
recent wedding of my roommate Jen and my
consequent premiere appearance as a
bridesmaid. In our school's elegant chapel,
amidst dozens of roses, dressed in
ball-length gowns, even I had to concede it
was too formal an occasion to go without.
Armed with the moral support of the bride and
the comraderie of fellow bridesmaid Hilary
(who'd had eerily similar conversations with
her own mother), I approached hitherto untried
territory: the Clinique counter at Macy's. (To
those of you who have read my reflections on
the temptations of mammon, I openly though
ashamedly confess to a measure of brazen
hypocrisy.)
I was a somewhat resistant patient. I flatly
refused foundation and powder, and my
"beauty consultant" really struggled to get me
to try the eyeliner, the application of which I still
haven't mastered. I was forced to reject out of
hand the first supposedly stylish eyeshadow
we tried because it made me look like I had a
big black eye. At last the consultant caught on
and started giving me everything in the color
"nude"; the blush was even "nude-nude" in
case one nude wasn't enough. That
succeeded in calming me down and I finally
finished my stint half an hour after Hilary, even
though we'd both started at the same time.
After all those hypo-allergenic minutes
squinting up at the consultant while she
attacked my face with brushes and cotton
balls, I became fascinated with her
makeup, too: a flawless, poreless, minutely
detailed mask that I vaguely wondered if I
could peel off in one super thin layer. For me
to achieve that look would take hours, but I bet
she had her routine down to ten minutes. I
didn't look like her when I was done, true. But I
did look different.
That's when the slew of guilt compliments
began. "Oh Sarah," I heard between sighs of
feminine delight, "you look so pretty with
makeup." Then the look of panic, the gulp of
guilt, and the giveaway I-mean: "I mean, of
course you're pretty without the makeup, too.
You have such a healthy glow. But that
eyeliner really does something;" If I hadn't
heard that same line such a ridiculous
number of times in a twenty-four hour period, I
might have gotten a trifle annoyed. As it was,
the whole business made me laugh. And I
had to concede the point: I do look
really nice with makeup. I mean, I look fine
without it. But a little kick of nude this and nude
that definitely adds a certain je ne sais
quoi. It also tends to confirm the suspicion
that my grandpa was right when he told me
that men are the more beautiful sex: they
never wear makeup and don't seem to suffer
any for it.
The problem for me is that makeup is never
just makeup. It's not simply about looking a
little prettier. It's about a whole host of issues
and fears and convictions that skip the
physical and shoot straight for the
psychological and spiritual. Like with my
mom: wearing makeup means you're a
professional, responsible adult to be taken
seriously. I know of another woman who
always wears makeup when she has to see
her ex-husband because it feels like a wall of
protection between her and him. Makes you
wonder what Tammy Faye thought she was
protecting herself from. My high school friends
plastered on their Bonnie Belle and Wet &
Wild like it was vaudeville grease paint to add
years and sophistication. Plenty of women
wear it to take off years. While I was
being done up at Macy's, a lady in her ‘70s or
‘80s came to the counter for a new tin of
powder. Her lipstick and blush were carefully
applied; the morning ritual of doing her
makeup probably helped her hold on to a bit of
femininity and youth. I found it charming and
appropriate. I could never understand, though,
my freshman roommate's obsession with
her makeup ; she could be practically
dying of a stomach flu and yet would still apply
the entire configuration of Estee Lauder before
stepping out of her parents' house in the
country to check the mailbox.
Most telling, I think, is the colloquialism that
equates applying makeup with "putting on my
face." What is that supposed to mean? I can
hear it now: "Oh Sarah, you look so nice with a
face. I mean, you look fine without one, too.
But having eyes and a nose and a mouth just
adds a certain je ne sais quoi;" I
wonder what it says about our self-perception
as women that we consider our natural faces
inferior to our painted faces. Or that we don't
consider our faces worth noticing if they don't
hit a certain threshold of pretty. Or that we
believe certain colors that never appear on
human skin unless indicating grave illness
can actually enhance it when in the form of
eyeshadow (green = nausea, purple = bruise,
yellow = gout).
Makeup isn't the only thing in women's lives to
do this, of course. There is any number of
substitutes for confidence and contentment
that women use to make themselves more
attractive. And they really are quite bizarre if
you look at them with brutal objectivity. Diets
equate certain foods with mortal sin and
cultivate hunger as a virtue. Astringents take
the oils away and lotions put them back in
again. Deodorants replace human scent with
artifical scent. Designer clothes trade money
for social status. High-heeled shoes and tight
pantyhose achieve something, maybe sex
appeal, but it's hard to believe that millions of
women consider the discomfort they cause
worth the prize. We even take razors to our
bodies and remove hair from places we deem
it unattractive (legs, armpits), yet leave it
completely intact elsewhere (eyelashes, head,
arms). Is it just me or is all of this a little
weird? And yet I can't imagine a socially
acceptable lifestyle in this country that doesn't
include at least some of those things; I'd feel
uncomfortable and ugly if I didn't indulge in
them regularly.
Then again, there might be something to the
distinction between the pretty public face and
the not-quite-pretty private one. Our less
attractive moments are reserved for the ones
we love. Roommates are the only people who
see us first thing in the morning while our
eyes are still full of gunk, our hair askew, our
breath atrocious. Spouses are the ones who
see us right before we go to bed at night,
makeup washed off, a day's worth of cares
etched into our faces, fitted stylish clothing
exchanged for grimy old pajamas. It would
never do to appear in front of the CEO during a
hostile takeover looking like that; but if you
couldn't look sloppy and unkempt in front of
your husband or grandma or best friend, it
would probably indicate a serious lack of trust.
Appearances, after all, are all we have to go
on out there in the harsh world, and it's a sign
of respect to look nice and clean for a
stranger. Like my mom always says when she's in an Oscar Wilde mood, "Only very shallow people are uninterested in appearances."
Going too far either way is a danger. It's
foolish to think appearances don't matter at
all. Nothing is more troublesome than denying
how much attraction plays in to the mystery of
love (who hasn't had a friend "like a brother"
that no amount of rationalizing could turn into
a potential lover?). What people show to the
public says a lot about what they think of
themselves. And yet at the same, to judge
solely by appearances, or to take a shallow
attitude towards appearances -- equating
money with morality, or something equally
judgmental -- is just as bad. That is why
makeup (and all those other many and
various things) ends up being exactly what we
make of them: either just makeup, or a
complete psychological profile.
Anyway, on that note, I must refresh my own
makeup before I go out for the day. I always
feel so naked without my nude lipstick.
|