| It didn’t hit me until I saw the Towers collapse.
The news out of New York and Washington
seemed like an especially bad dream.
Friends and co-workers kept calling, telling
me about the latest developments in a story I
steadfastly refused to follow.
Then I saw the Twin Towers collapse. That’s
when I got mad. Real Mad. The kind of angry
that makes you want to lash out. The kind of
angry that agrees with the tee-shirt that says
"Send ‘em all to Hell and let God sort it out."
I thought of the role the World Trade Center
had played in my life. I’d worked there, and
even when I worked in another building in
Lower Manhattan, the Trade Center was
where I got off the "A" train every morning. I
bought my breakfast -- coffee in a blue and
white paper cup that I’ve never seen outside of
New York, and a bagel with butter -- everyday
literally in the shadow of the Twin Towers. But
those shadows are gone -- along with
thousands of lives. So if this seems personal,
you bet it is.
Although we have reason to be angry -- both at
the people who did this and at the loss of life
-- we can’t stop there. If we don’t take some
lessons away from Tuesday's events, if we
don’t learn from our mistakes and gain some
perspective, then we can add pointlessness
to the injuries inflicted by the terrorists.
The first lesson that jumps out is that
beliefs and worldviews matter. There are
churches and belief systems in America to
suit every taste and inclination. But religion in
America is, for the most part, private and very
malleable. We cherish our pluralism. We
rightly, in my opinion, consider the messiness
associated with pluralism to be a small price
for the freedom of thought and action it affords.
We have become adept at the compromises
and splitting of differences necessary to keep
a pluralistic society going.
But, as yesterday’s events reminded us, not
everyone thinks the way we do. If, as is the
suspicion, the culprits are Islamic extremists,
Americans are facing a foe they can’t bargain
with. There are no differences to split. We are
facing a foe so sure of the rightness of his
cause that he is willing to fly a plane into a
building. In the aftermath of the attacks words
like "senseless," and "madmen" were thrown
around in a way that suggested we couldn’t
get our minds around the fact that perfectly
rational people could interpret the world
differently from us. And how can you hope to
defeat a foe you can’t begin to understand?
It’s clear: our beliefs, as well as other
people’s, can hurt us.
The other thing we need to remember is that,
pardon the cliché, there’s no such thing as
a free lunch. For the past three decades,
America has reaped the benefits of
globalization, in particular, greater prosperity.
Now some of the costs are manifesting
themselves: the mobility that allowed the
terrorists to enter the country; and the
communications technology, in particular, the
Internet, that is thought to have enabled them
to plan the attack. You’ve probably heard
expressions like "global village" and "the
world is getting smaller." Before yesterday,
Americans were unacquainted with the
downside of these ideas. The good news is
that we can be anywhere in the world in less
than a day. The bad news is that anyone in the
world can be here in the same time.
And that means that Americans, who value
convenience over almost everything, are going
to have to learn to live with more
inconvenience. To cite a small example, while
Europeans are accustomed to arriving several
hours before departure due to security
requirements, Americans have perfected
getting to the airport just before take-off. My
only prediction is that this practice, along with
curbside check-in, will soon be a thing of the
past as the airlines take their cues from El AL,
Israel’s national airline. And if the thought of
tightened security at airports annoys you, well,
you’ve made my point: we may be so
accustomed to that free lunch that we’re
unprepared to pay even a highly subsidized
price.
But even in the midst of suffering and evil,
there’s still hope. It’s not based on confidence
in our ability to catch and punish the
perpetrators, or in our ability to rise to the
challenge. No, our hope isn’t based on
anything that men do. It’s based on what we
know about God and His goodness. Now,
God’s goodness might seem like an
inappropriate and even cruel subject to raise
at this time. Thousands of people are dead.
But whose fault is that? Man’s, not God’s.
We have trouble remembering the distinction.
We like to stick God with responsibility for the
actions of man. We call events like yesterday’s
"tragedies." They’re not. When a child is
accidentally struck by a car, that’s a tragedy.
When the car deliberately runs down the child,
it’s murder, an act whose author is human.
Blaming God for what happened yesterday,
while simultaneously clinging to our freedom
of action, is an attempt to have it both ways.
The phrase that comes to my mind on a day
like yesterday is "thy kingdom come," or as I
learned it, vengase tu reino. I hope
precisely because I know that the kingdom I
yearn for looks nothing like what we see
around us. It’s a kingdom whose king suffered
on behalf of others, and who forgave those
who treated him unjustly. It’s a kingdom
whose subjects are called upon to suffer
injustice rather than commit it. It’s a kingdom
whose outline you see every time man proves
the aptness of the Roman phrase homo
homini lupus, man is a wolf to his fellow
men.
We see it because something in us knows we
weren’t meant to prey on each other.
Something has gone terribly wrong. However,
Christians know that one day things will be set
right. And this making things right began when
God decided that the only answer to the wolf in
each of us was a lamb -- a lamb who laid
down his life, not only for Broadway, but for
those who bombed it, as well. Thy Kingdom
Come.
|