|
by Gina R. Dalfonzo
Starter. The word may remind you of
that junky old car you bought in high school,
with the steering wheel held together by duct
tape. Or the house with the leaky roof and the
little creatures living in the walls.
Or that first marriage that didn’t work out.
It sounds crazy, but the term starter
marriage has become part of our cultural
vocabulary. According to ABCNews.com, in
1998, the Census Bureau found more than 3
million divorced 18-to 29-year-olds. A starter
marriage usually begins when both spouses
are in their 20s, and ends within five years or
so, before children come along.
“I view the marriage as a rehearsal,” Vanessa
Mobley, one starter-marriage veteran, said on
ABC’s Good Morning America a few
weeks ago. “We, as generation Xers, live in a
culture of new beginnings where we can fix
anything.”
Fix it, that is, by bailing out. People who have
done this say things like, “The second after we
were married, I knew I had made a terrible,
terrible mistake,” or “I have this journal entry
from the first day of my honeymoon where I
wrote, ‘Oh no. . . . What did I just do?’” In a
hopeless situation, what can people do but
cut their losses and move on?
Even Naomi Schaefer declares in the
conservative National Review, “These
men and women may suffer some emotional
trauma from the split but will land on their feet,
and even have a better and more realistic idea
of what to look for in a spouse and what to
expect from a marriage the next time around.
Maybe we should . . . regard the
starter-marriage phenomenon as
confirmation of a widening interest in
permanent relationships among today’s
college-educated young adults.”
Well, temporarily permanent, anyhow. But as
paradoxical as it sounds, Schaefer is onto
something. For if you dig below the surface of
all this talk about regaining freedom and
learning valuable lessons, you’ll find an
intriguing truth: Nobody wants a “starter
marriage.”
Pamela Paul, an editor at American
Demographics, should know; her
marriage broke up within a year. Her new
book, The Starter Marriage and the Future
of Matrimony, helped bring the term into
the mainstream. Paul had first heard it when a
fellow divorcée asked her, “You had a starter
marriage too?”
Paul recalls, “I bristle at the term; it seems
derogatory, dismissive, superficial. It makes
my marriage sound flighty and somehow
featherweight. It also has the unpleasant ring
of truth.”
Like most of the divorced men and women
she interviewed, Paul never quite comes to
terms with “starter marriage.” In the beginning,
these people didn’t think they were just trying
an experiment. Many of them wanted to get
right what their parents got wrong. Michael,
one such man, saw his parents divorce when
he was in eighth grade. “I just knew that I
wanted my marriage to be different,” he says.
Yet these Gen-Xers absorbed a basic tenet
from their parents that would handicap their
own marriages. Paul explains, “A fundamental
shift in public opinion took place [during the
1970s], producing a new truism: ‘People
should not stay married if they’re not happy.’ ”
That philosophy is echoed repeatedly by her
interviewees: “I figured, you only live once and
I was still young.” “Why put in all the effort for
something that’s not so great anyway?” “My
marriage was an unfortunate mistake, and it
wasn’t worth saving because we were not
meant to be.” “I believe in marriage, but if it’s
not meant to be, better to get out sooner than
later.”
It’s not meant to be. The words are
reminiscent of that annoying term “soul mate”;
both expressions imply that everything is
settled for you in advance and you merely go
along for the ride. You find your “soul mate,”
you know it was meant to be, and you get
married! Simple as that.
Then the glamour wears off. You can’t agree
on how to budget, or he isn’t even interested
in budgeting, preferring to spend money
however he pleases. You like a stable
lifestyle, but she wants to drag you all over the
country. Tensions escalate, you can’t resolve
your differences, and you think: This is not
how it’s meant to be.
What happened to that fun, caring, sensitive
person you married? Maybe he or she never
really existed. All you know is you’re trapped
with someone you can’t stand. Maybe it’s time
to go find the person who was truly meant for
you.
Pamela Paul writes, “Some of the reasons
why ex-young marrieds decide to divorce may
sound superficial, immature, or weak, and
oftentimes they are — they reflect marriages
that were frequently superficial, immature, or
weak. If the reasons to divorce sound wrong,
it’s usually because the marriage itself was
never right in the first place.”
To be fair, these survivors of starter marriages
realize that marriage takes work. At least, they
do now. The interviewees in the book keep
referring to the new “growth” that they gained
from their first marriage, which they hope will
help them do better if they marry again. But for
all their new perspective and maturity, they still
are haunted by loss and shame: “I don’t think I
will ever really be 100 percent over it.” “I had a
complete emotional breakdown.” “I caused
sadness to someone who didn’t deserve it.” “I
felt like a total failure.” “I felt scarred.”
“Some emotional trauma,” indeed.
Beyond a doubt, many young couples rush
into marriage without really knowing each
other and with unreasonable expectations. But
once they find themselves married, they have
created something more than what Paul calls
a “contract.” She unwittingly relegates one of
the most significant ideas in her book to a
footnote, which states, “According to one strict
Christian reading of the Bible, marriage is not
only a love commitment but also one that joins
two bodies of flesh into one, creating a bond
of kinship.” Actually, that isn’t a “strict Christian
reading of the Bible” (although Christians do
differ over the Bible’s teachings on divorce).
That’s what the Bible itself says, and as
always, it’s right.
When we as a society concede that some
marriages just aren’t working and should end
before children are born, we’re making a
grave mistake. The end of a marriage is the
destruction of a union sanctioned by God —
whether or not the participants believe in Him
— which we’re warned in the wedding
ceremony to “let no man put asunder.” But a
society that leaves God out of its affairs, as
ours does more and more every day, loses its
grasp of the concept of redemption, God’s
greatest work. Every day He is present in
matters both large and small, turning bad into
good, bringing unlooked-for hope into the
most hopeless situation. And the more we
seek to know God with all our hearts, the
better equipped we are to imitate that work.
But now we no longer look at a bad situation
and ask how we can try to make it better. Our
instinct is to head for the escape hatch.
But considering the odds against it, how do
we expect any marriage to last?
Someone once said that marriage is like tying
a cat and dog together and letting them work
things out. A person who has always had the
freedom to put his own interests first bonds
with another person who has known the same
freedom. Self-sacrifice is at the very heart of
marriage, no matter unworthy our spouse
might seem. If we want the benefits that we
know marriage can bring, we must pay the
price from the very beginning.
My parents eloped when they were 22 and 21.
Many modern commentators on marriage
protest that even 25 is too young to know what
you want for the rest of your life. My mom and
dad had $300 and a car between them, and
they certainly didn’t know what they were
doing. In fact, when I showed my mother the
quote from the woman who asked herself,
“What did I just do?” she laughed and said
she could relate.
They moved more than 20 times in the first 25
years. He went to war twice. They differed
about budgeting, lifestyle, and all the rest.
Their marriage survived illness, loneliness,
too much alcohol, and a whole slew of
problems their children brought them, as
children will do. It even survived the five years
between their respective conversions to
Christ.
Last September marked their 35th
anniversary. At times, especially in those first
years, they thought they couldn’t stick it out for
one more minute. But ask them today, and
without hesitation they will say it’s been worth
it.
You can’t go into marriage thinking about what
you’ll get from it unless you’re giving even
more thought to what you’ll put into it. You
can’t think of it in terms of personal “growth,”
unless you’re also thinking about how you can
help your spouse grow. And by the
unfathomable grace of God, even the most
superficial, most immature, weakest marriage
can be saved, if we realize that there is
something sacred and worth fighting for amid
the superficiality and weakness — something
far too precious to throw away.
|