|
by Gina R. Dalfonzo
Your mission, should you choose to accept it:
Take a 2,000-year-old story, probably the most
famous and beloved story in the world. Find a
way to tell it to an entire nation so that it
seems fresh and compelling. And make sure
that no one will be either bored at hearing it
again, or offended that you’re telling it in a new
way.
How would you do it?
Accepting the Dare
In 1940, English detective novelist, playwright,
and essayist Dorothy L. Sayers took up that
challenge. The British Broadcasting
Corporation had asked her to write a series of
radio plays based on the gospel — the first
time any actor would portray Jesus in England
since the 17th century.
Two weeks before the first play was due to be
broadcast, Dorothy read some samples of
dialogue at a press conference. As her
biographer Barbara Reynolds notes, the
reaction was vehement in some quarters, with
opponents denouncing her for acts of
“irreverence bordering on the blasphemous.”
Petitions were sent to the Prime
Minister and to the Archbishop of Canterbury,
urging them to use their influence to get the
plays banned. The Parliamentary Secretary to
the Minister of Information was asked in the
House of Commons if he was ‘taking steps to
revise the script of a series of plays on the life
of Jesus … so as to avoid offence to Christian
feeling.’ … When Singapore fell to the
Japanese the event was interpreted in the
Press as a sign of God’s judgment on Britain
for allowing such blasphemy to be
committed.
But Dorothy wasn’t trying to commit
blasphemy. She was using modern speech
simply to bring to life a group of ancient
people who were just like people of every
place and time. As she saw it, Matthew the
disciple, “a contemptible little quisling official .
. . until something came to change his heart,”
easily might have said to a fellow disciple
some Hebrew equivalent of the words that
shocked the popular press: “Fact is, Philip my
boy, you’ve been had for a sucker.” If people
could hear the story in their own everyday
language, Dorothy reasoned, they would
come to realize that “God was executed by
people painfully like us, in a society very
similar to our own.”
When the plays aired, after much wrangling
with the BBC and British religious authorities,
Dorothy’s viewpoint was justified. Most of the
audience responded with delight and, more
importantly, deeper understanding.
Clergymen and unchurched people alike told
her how much the plays had meant to them.
Dorothy’s friend C.S. Lewis said of the series
years later, “I have re-read it in every Holy
Week since it first appeared, and never
re-read it without being deeply moved.” And
Reynolds wrote in 1993, “Thousands are still
alive who heard the broadcasts when they
were young and whose lives were lastingly
affected by them. . . . It was a great
evangelistic undertaking, an unprecedented
achievement in religious education and one
which has never since been equalled.”
That was the same year I fell in love with the
plays, collectively titled The Man Born to Be
King, in a college class. I would
encourage every Christian to read them. But
almost as significant as the plays themselves
is the story of how they were written.
That’s because the challenge posed to
Dorothy Sayers is the challenge posed to
every Christian. Although the world has
changed greatly during the past 60 years,
some things have remained the same. Just
as in Dorothy’s time, many people know
nothing about the gospel. Many others are
hostile toward it. And still others have heard it
so many times without giving it one serious
thought that they might as well not know it. So
the task falls to every one of us to share the
story in the most compelling way that we can.
This being the case, we can learn a lot from
the way Dorothy handled that task.
Share Your Inadequacies
In some ways, Dorothy was the last person
you’d expect to undertake such
unconventional evangelism. As a “high
church” Anglican, she had little interest in altar
calls and none at all in public displays of
religious emotion. And although she had been
a believer for most of her life, she had strayed
from the Christian life in the past, having given
birth to an illegitimate son at age 30. She also
confessed to struggling with her own
“intellectual and spiritual pride, vainglory,
self-opinionated dogmatism . . . polemical
fury, shortness of temper,” and much more.
On the other hand, all this meant that she
clearly understood the need for God’s grace.
Consider a speech she wrote for Mary
Magdalen after the crucifixion:
The Master’s the only good man
I ever met who knew how miserable it felt to
be bad. It was as if he got right inside you, and
felt all the horrible things you were
doing to yourself. . . . But I don’t suppose
Judas ever let him in. He was too proud. I
think it was harder for him than for people like
Matthew and me and that poor robber on the
cross. We know we’re so awful anyhow that
it’s no good pretending we’re not, even to
ourselves.
How many of us are willing to admit that? I
remember attending a Christian high school
where everyone was so obsessed with being
perfect that you’d think they didn’t even need a
Savior. Like many people, they seemed to
think the most important part of the Christian
life is presenting a squeaky-clean front to the
world. But as my pastor once remarked in a
sermon, sharing the gospel has to mean
sharing our own inadequacies. The truth is
that each one of us is an unlikely evangelist,
unable to help ourselves — let alone anyone
else — except by God’s grace and power.
Use Your Gifts
Oddly enough, though Dorothy enjoyed writing
religious dramas and essays, she didn’t
consider evangelism her “proper job.” Her role
in life, she believed, was that of a storyteller,
and she got fed up with appeals to make
speeches, participate in debates, and share
her testimony. Writing to Lewis about her
attempts to explain Christianity to a confused
atheist, she complained, “You like souls. I
don’t. God is simply taking advantage of the
fact that I can’t stand intellectual chaos, and it
isn’t fair.”
That attitude seems unusual today. But
Dorothy may have had a better basic
understanding of the gifts given to each
Christian than many of us. As Paul wrote to
the Corinthians, “There are diversities of gifts,
but the same Spirit. There are differences of
ministries, but the same Lord.” Not all of us
are good at writing, or public speaking, or
door-to-door visitation, or even handing out
tracts. Yet all of us have the responsibility of
sharing Christ with unbelievers. So we each
have to discover our own gifts — both talents
and spiritual gifts.
Maybe you’re an artist, a musician, or an
athlete. Maybe you’re planning to go into
accounting or to become a scientist. Perhaps
you like to work with children or the elderly, or
spend time with the sick, or counsel
abortion-minded women or disturbed
teenagers, or serve meals to the homeless. It
doesn’t matter what your gifts are; the
important thing is that you find them and use
them to obey the One who gave them to you.
Of course, the other side of the coin is that we
have to trust God to use us in the way that He
chooses — because although He wants us to
use our gifts, He also has a way of springing
surprises on us. As Dorothy discovered with
her atheist, it’s amazing what we can
accomplish when we let God stretch our
boundaries.
Know Whom You Have Believed
It seems incredible now that such a fuss was
made over a few words of slang in Dorothy’s
plays. Yet I know Christians today with that
same fussy attitude — people who are
downright disturbed by the suggestion that
Jesus ever may have laughed. Perhaps we’ve
seen too many travesties like The Last
Temptation of Christ to be enthusiastic about
fresh approaches to the story. But too often,
we err in the opposite direction, making it
seem dull, conventional, sentimental — in a
word, safe.
“To make of His story something that could
neither startle, nor shock, nor terrify, nor excite,
nor inspire a living soul is to crucify the Son of
God afresh and put Him to an open shame,”
Dorothy wrote. “Let me tell you, good Christian
people, an honest writer would be ashamed
to treat a nursery tale as you have treated the
greatest drama in history.” If we can’t
remember what Jesus is really like, how can
we explain to the rest of the world that He
loves and understands them? Why would they
be interested in a remote figure in a stained
glass window who seems hopelessly far from
their immediate realities, a Man who stalked
the earth with nothing but a frown on His face?
Have we forgotten who Jesus was and what
He came to do? He was God incarnate
— living on earth as a human being. He ate,
drank, wept, suffered, and triumphed, and
incidentally made some of the wittiest, most
profound statements ever uttered. And the
dregs of society — the very people we would
expect to avoid Him — came to Him in droves.
If they don’t anymore, is it His fault or ours?
‘The Life Was with You’
Again, Dorothy’s Mary Magdalen gets to the
heart of the matter when she says to Jesus in
the seventh play,
Did you know? My companions
and I came there that day to mock you. We
thought you would be sour and grim, hating all
beauty and treating all life as an enemy. But
when I saw you, I was amazed. You were the
only person there that was really alive. The
rest of us were going about
half-dead—making the gestures of life,
pretending to be real people. The life was not
with us but with you—intense and shining, like
the strong sun when it rises and turns the
flames of our candles to pale smoke. And I
wept and was ashamed, seeing myself such
a thing of trash and tawdry. But when you
spoke to me, I felt the flame of the sun in my
heart. I came alive for the first time. And I love
life all the more since I have learnt its
meaning.
May that meaning come alive in our own
hearts, that we might share it with a world in
need.
|