|
by Karla Dial
The message to Janis Price came through
loud and clear: Don’t let your convictions guide
you when a student asks your opinion about
subjects like Christianity or homosexuality —
at least not unless our convictions have been
pre-approved by your boss. The message
was hard to miss when she found her job
scaled back and her pay slashed by $10,000
— all, she says, because she made copies of
a Christian magazine available to students.
But just because Janis got the message, that
didn’t mean she had to accept it.
Price, who has been an administrator and
professor in DePauw University’s Education
Department for 15 years, filed a lawsuit
against school officials in Putnam County
(Indiana) Circuit Court April 17. She charged
them with religious discrimination and
harassment after her pay was slashed by 25
percent and she was stripped of her
administrative duties.
Price says she’s well known among the 2,000
liberal-arts students on the Greencastle, Ind.,
campus as a born-again Christian who has
sponsored several discipleship groups. Each
year she taught one senior-level class, Field
Experience. And each year, she would tell her
students about Teachers in Focus — a
now-defunct monthly education magazine
written from a Christian perspective that was
published by Focus on the Family — and
leave sample copies on a table for anyone
interested.
This was hardly high-pressure stuff, Price told
Boundless. No assignments were ever
given involving the magazine, and no one was
forced to read it, take it home or subscribe to
it. And for 14 years, no one complained about
it.
That all changed May 16, 2001.
At the end of the Friday class period, Price put
four sample copies of Teachers on a
table, gave her short annual spiel, and told the
students they were free to go.
The trouble was that the content of one issue
was far from politically correct. That issue
featured a cover story on how the homosexual
movement tries to propagandize children as
young as 8 by teaching about “alternative
lifestyles” in the classroom. It provided
arguments against the idea that
homosexuality was healthy and natural by
authors including Boundless
contributor J.
Budziszewski and psychotherapist Joseph
Nicolosi, perhaps the leading specialist
in helping people come out of homosexuality.
Before anyone left the room, one of Price’s
students thumbed through the homosexuality
article, then asked her what she thought about
homosexual teachers.
“I simply said to her that if a school hired
someone to teach English or math or science,
they needed to do the best job they could
teaching English or math or science,” Price
told Boundless. “She seemed
satisfied. Never called me, never signed up for
an appointment, never talked to me about it
again.”
And that, Price thought, was the end of that.
Seven weeks later, she found out her troubles
were just beginning.
‘Anti-gay literature’
In early July, Price received an invitation to
meet with Neal Abraham, DePauw’s vice
president for academic affairs. Only then did
she find out that after leaving her class, the
student had complained about the
homosexuality article to another education
professor, who then complained to the
department head — who then complained to
Abraham.
According to the lawsuit, during that meeting
Abraham quizzed Price about both her
teaching practices and her faith.
“Do you teach Christianity in your classes?” he
asked her. “How do students know that you’re
a Christian?”
Price said she told Abraham she discussed
ethics in her classes — which are part of the
state education board’s exam for teachers —
but not her personal relationship with Jesus;
and that students knew she was a Christian
the same way they knew other people on
campus were Christians. At that point, Price
said, Abraham pulled out the Teachers
article about classroom homosexuality.
“He’d read parts of the article to me and say,
‘Do you believe that?’ Then he’d read a little
more and say, ‘Do you believe that?’ ” Price
said. “In every case I agreed with what the
article said.”
Price thought the line of questioning was
one-sided and unfair.
“Tell me,” the lawsuit says she asked
Abraham, “how is it that I am to be tolerant of
others’ beliefs, but they don’t need to be
tolerant of mine?”
“We cannot tolerate the intolerable,” Abraham
told her, indicating the magazine article. He
then dismissed her, asking her not to mention
their meeting to anyone else “out of respect for
the student’s privacy,” according to the lawsuit.
Two weeks later, Price was called back to
Abraham’s office for another meeting and told
to be prepared to stay there for up to two
hours. This time, she said, he didn’t make eye
contact with her, but read from a set of notes.
He told her the administration “was going to
be cutting back my position, cutting my pay 25
percent, that I’d no longer have my class, that
while certain duties would be taken away from
me, other duties would be added — and I
could either accept that or I could resign.
“I was just devastated.”
The day after the meeting, Abraham sent Price
two letters accusing her of “professional
intolerance” for providing students “with
certain magazines” he described as “anti-gay
literature.”
After reviewing her options, Price decided to
accept her $10,000-a-year pay cut, but started
exploring legal options within days.
“It’s a very clear case of religious
discrimination,” Price’s attorney, John R. Price
(no relation) of Indianapolis told
Boundless. “I know that universities
tend to be myopic when it comes to religious
topics. They don’t see any problem with
discussing religion unless it’s Christianity,
and then suddenly they see a separation of
church and state.”
The university referred all comment to its
attorney, John Neighbours, also of
Indianapolis, who was not available to return
calls from Boundless. The school has
until the end of May to respond to the suit; a
hearing date will be determined afterward.
For her part, Price sees her case as only the
latest example of anti-Christian harassment
by officials on college campuses nationwide.
But if it’s far from the first time something like
this has happened, she wants to make sure
it’s one of the last.
“This is typical,” she said of her punishment.
“And it also has to stop.”
|